Last Issues
September-October 2010
July-August 2010
May-June 2010
March-April 2010
January-February 2010

Previous Issues


 

May-June 2010

Dear readers,
Would you be interested in knowing whether you are at risk of carrying an inheritable disease? Or perhaps, receiving information about your DNA so that you can map out your ancestral roots? “All it takes is a little bit of spit” – and perhaps a bit of money.

Traditionally, genetic tests have been available through a healthcare provider who decides the necessity for testing and who is responsible for interpreting the results. Now, with ongoing genetic discoveries and improvements in technology, private companies are marketing genetic testing directly to consumers, mostly via the Internet.

Although these “direct-to-consumer” services promote accessibility, they raise a number of ethical, legal and social concerns. In light of these emerging issues, the HumGen team is proud to announce the creation of DTCGen (http://www.dtcgenetest.org)– one of many HumGen modules, which offers a database of laws and policies and a comprehensive literature review on direct-to-consumer genetic testing. We hope that you will find the information useful!
For example, included in the DTCGen module is the European Society of Human Genetics’ draft Statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health purposes. The Public and Professional Policy Committee (PPPC) of the ESHG is seeking comments and feedback regarding the recommendations before May 16, 2010 (for final approval by June 2010).
Happy reading!
Thu Minh Nguyen & Ma'n H. Abdul-Rahman (Co-Editors-in-Chief)

Research and Deceased Persons : The Secondary Use of Medical Data and Biological Materials
Tassé A. M., Letendre M, Knoppers BM

Abstract: The proliferation of data and the banking of biological materials collected during medical care leaves the impression that an impressive amount of resources are available for research. Moreover, the longevity of these resources often exceeds the lifetime of the persons involved. In this context, the secondary use of data and biological materials from deceased individuals raises important legal and ethical questions.

(2010) 8:1 GenEdit 1-9



INTERNATIONAL / REGIONAL

Institute for Science Ethics and Innovation - The University of Manchester: Who Owns Science? The Manchester Manifesto
Manchester - January 1, 2009
Link: URL
Key Words: Access Info/Material - Commercialization - Conflict of Interest - Integrity - Intellectual Property
World Medical Association (WMA): WMA Statement on Embryonic Stem Cell Research
New Delhi - October 1, 2009
Link: URL
Key Words: Consent - Donor - Embryo - Governance - Research - Stem Cell

European Medicines Agency: Note for Guidance on Genomic Biomarkers Related to Drug Response: Context, Structure and Format of Qualification Submissions [draft]
London - June 1, 2009
Link: URL
Key Words: Pharmacogenomics
European Medicines Agency: Concerns over unregulated medicinal products containing stem cells
London - April 16, 2010
Link: URL
Key Words: Education - Ethics Review Board - Family - Governance - Patient/Participant/Individual - Professional - Stem Cell
European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG): Statement of the ESHG on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health purposes (DRAFT)
Vienna - April 16, 2010
Link: URL
Key Words: Commercialization - Confidentiality - Consent - Consumer - Counseling (general) - Counseling (Post-test) - Counseling (Pre-test) - Data - DNA - Education - Genetic Testing - Governance - Public Health - Research - Storage
NATIONAL

France/Government: Arrêté du 19 février 2010 modifiant l’arrêté du 23 juin 2009 relatif à l’information, à la demande et au consentement de la femme enceinte à la réalisation d’une analyse portant sur les marqueurs sériques maternels et à la réalisation du prélèvement et des analyses en vue d’établir un diagnostic prénatal in utero prévues à l’article R. 2131-1 du code de la santé publique
Paris - February 19, 2010
Link: URL
Key Words: Consent - Foetus - Genetic Testing - Prenatal
Medical Research Council (MRC): Code of Practice for the use of Human Stem Cell Lines
London - April 1, 2010
Link: URL
Key Words: Adult - Biobank - Commercialization - Confidentiality - Conflict of Interest - Consent - Databases - Disability - Donor - Embryo - Embryos (created for research) - Ethical Review - Ethics Review Board - Foetus - Gamete - Gene Therapy - Genetic Information - Genetic Testing - Governance - Incompetent Adult - Intellectual Property - Liability - Minor/Child - Ownership - Patents - Privacy - Professional - Reproductive Cloning - Research - Researcher - Somatic Therapy - Stem Cell - Storage - Surplus Embryos - Therapeutic Cloning - Tissue - Umbilical Cord Blood - Waiver of Consent
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB): Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis and Application of Pharmacogenomics in Clinical Practice
Washington - January 1, 2010
Link: URL
Key Words: Patient/Participant/Individual - Pharmacogenomics

Implementation and Integration
Organized by: The Human Variome Project
Date: May 10-14, 2010
Location: Paris, France
Information: http://www.humanvariomeproject.org/meetings/paris/

Biobanques et consentement: les enjeux légaux et éthiques à considérer selon les spécificités des participants
Organized by: CGP
Date: May 10, 2010
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Information: http://www.acfas.net/programme/c_78_17.html

78e Congrès de l'ACFAS
Organized by: Association francophone pour le savoir (ACFAS)
Date: May 10-14, 2010
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Information: http://www.acfas.ca/congres/a_propos.html

The Biology of Genomes
Organized by: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Date: May 11-15, 2010
Location: Cold Spring Harbor (NY), United States
Information: http://meetings.cshl.edu/meetings/genome10.shtml

HUGO Meeting 2010
Organized by: Human Genome Organisation
Date: May 18-21, 2010
Location: Montpellier, France
Information: http://assises-genetique.org/fr/agenda/date-201001/id-14-hugo-2010-human-genome-organisation-meeting-montpellier-france

16th ISCT Annual Meeting
Organized by: International Society for Cell Therapy (ISCT)
Date: May 23-26, 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA, United States
Information: http://www.celltherapy2010.com/

Consortium Meeting
Organized by: ENGAGE
Date: May 31-June 1, 2010
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Information: http://www.euengage.org/events.html

European Human Genetics Conference 2010
Organized by: European Society of Human Genetics
Date: June 12-15, 2010
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Information: https://www.eshg.org/eshg2010.0.html

Summer Institute - Genetics, Ethics and Clinical Translation
Organized by: ENGAGE and P3G
Date: June 22-25, 2010
Location: Egmond aan Zee, Netherland
Information: http://www.euengage.org/Summer_Institute_2010.html

International Data Sharing Conference
Organized by: Center for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX)
Date: September 20-22, 2010
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
Information: http://helex.medsci.ox.ac.uk/data-sharing-international-conference-1

4th National Conference on Genomics and Public Health: Using Genomic Information to Improve Health Now and in the Future
Organized by: Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Date: December 8-10, 2010
Location: Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Information: https://www.cmpinc.net/2010PHGConference/savethedate.aspx


Black L., Simard J., Knoppers B.M., "Genetic Testing, Physicians and the Law: Will the Tortoise Ever Catch Up with the Hare?", (2010) 16 Ann. Health L.,115
Abstract: As science progresses and new treatments for (and genetic susceptibility to) disease are discovered, questions arise as to how physicians relate this information to patients. This is especially important in the field of cancer research, where the study of genetics has changed how researchers think about causes and therapies. As genetic tests become cheaper and more widespread and as potential patients continue to hear and read sensational stories about genetic disorders and testing, the question becomes: Will physicians face new liabilities based on inaccurate or misleading results, or for disclosing (or failing to disclose) relevant results to family members of a patient.

Borry P., Howard H.C., Sénécal K., Avard D., "Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies' policies with regard to genetic testing in minors",

(2010) 9:1 Familial Cancer 51


Abstract: More and more companies are advertising and selling genetic tests directly to consumers. Considering the ethical, legal, and psychological concerns surrounding genetic testing in minors, a study of companies’ websites was performed in order to describe and analyze their policies with respect to this issue. Of the 29 companies analyzed, 13 did not provide any information about this matter, eight companies allowed genetic testing upon parental request, four companies stated that their website is not directed to children under 18 years, and four companies suggested that in order to be tested, applicants should have reached the age of legal majority. If private companies offer genetic tests which are also offered in a clinical setting, can they be expected to adhere to the existing clinical guidelines with regard to these tests? If so, a certain ambiguity exists. Many companies are emphasizing in their disclaimers that their services are not medical services and should not be used as a basis for making medical decisions. Nonetheless, it remains debatable whether genetic testing in minors would be appropriate in this context. In line with the Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing, the Human Genetics Commission addressed the problem of non-consensual testing and recommended not to supply genetic testing services directly to those under the age of 16 or to those not able to make a competent decision regarding testing.

Caulfield T., Knoppers B.M., "Consent, Privacy & Research Biobanks", (2010) 1 Genome Canada, 1, online: URL
Abstract: In March 2009, Time Magazine picked biobanking as one of the TOP 10 Ideas changing the world right now. Indeed, large biobanks, linked with health, demographic and administrative data, are proliferating in countries around the world, not least of which is Canada, Scientists are poised internationally with an unprecedented ability to tease out complex interactions between genes and environment, enhancing our understanding of health and disease and paving the way towards a future of personalized medicine and public health. Meanwhile, existing legal and policy frameworks for personal data protection are founded on the concept of informed consent, the application of which has proven to be challengingfor advancing biobank research and related scientific progress in Canada. This Policy Brief explores three possible policy options for implementing the concept of consent in the context of research biobanks: 1) specific and fully informed consent for each project; 2) broad initial consent accompanied by appropriate governance; and 3) opt-out model, The types of research biobanks being contemplated include: large populationbased biobanks, disease-specific biobanks and biobanks created from left-over archival tissue originally collected in the context of clinical care.

Joly Y., McClellan K.A., Knoppers B.M., "Personalized Vaccines and Public Health Genomics: Anticipating and Monitoring the ELSIs", (2010) 8 Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, 4
Abstract: Personalized vaccines have the potential to be one of the most promising genomics applications in public health. Personalized vaccines could improve global health by addressing some of the most threatening diseases of our time. In order to ensure that personalized vaccine research and development are not derailed by unforeseen novel ELSIs, it is important to think ahead about the potential pitfalls and socio-ethical repercussions of research in this field.

Knoppers B.M., Abdul-Rahman (Zawati) M.H., "Health Privacy in Genetic Research: Populations and Persons", (2009) 28:2 Politics and the Life Sciences, 99
Abstract: [None available]

Tassé A.M., Budin-Ljøsne I., Knoppers B.M., Harris J.R., "Retrospective access to data: The ENGAGE consent experience", (2010) 18 EJHG 741–745, online: URL
Abstract: The rapid emergence of large-scale genetic databases raises issues at the nexus of medical law and ethics, as well as the need, at both national and international levels, for an appropriate and effective framework for their governance. This is even more so for retrospective access to data for secondary uses, wherein the original consent did not foresee such use. The first part of this paper provides a brief historical overview of the ethical and legal frameworks governing consent issues in biobanking generally, before turning to the secondary use of retrospective data in epidemiological biobanks. Such use raises particularly complex issues when (1) the original consent provided is restricted; (2) the minor research subject reaches legal age; (3) the research subject dies; or (4) samples and data were obtained during medical care. Our analysis demonstrates the inconclusive, and even contradictory, nature of guidelines and confirms the current lack of compatible regulations. The second part of this paper uses the European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology (ENGAGE Consortium) as a case study to illustrate the challenges of research using previously collected data sets in Europe. Our study of 52 ENGAGE consent forms and information documents shows that a broad range of mechanisms were developed to enable secondary use of the data that are part of the ENGAGE Consortium.

Tazzite A., Roky R., Avard D., "Les implications éthiques de la conservation des échantillons biologiques", (2009) 2:3 Journal international de bioéthique, 87
Abstract: [Available only in French]


• PHG Foundation – Monthly News : http://www.phgfoundation.org/pages/update.htm
• CDC Office of Public Health Genomics - Genomics & Health Weekly Update:
    http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/update/current.htm


Editor-in-chief: Thu Minh Nguyen  |  Associate editor: Ma'n H. Zawati |  Contributing editors: HumGen Team   | Webmaster: Dan-Thanh Truong  | Director: Bartha Maria Knoppers  |  Research Director: Denise Avard


The GenInfo newsletter and the Editorial can be reproduced without permission.
The source has to be identified.